Wednesday, December 4, 2019

Performance management Theories


Performance Defined
Performance means both behaviors and results. Behaviors emanate from the performer and transform performance from abstraction to action. Not just the instruments for results, behaviors are also outcomes in their own right- the product of mental and physical effort applied to tasks – and can be judged apart from results by Brumbach (1988: 387).

Performance management
Performance management is a systematic process for improving individual, team and organizational performance. Brumbach (1988: 389) suggest that ‘human performance is managed in order to achieve positive successes, avoid negative successes and failures and be hospitable to positive failures’. Getting better results by understanding and managing performance within an agreed framework of planned goals, standards and competency requirements are means of the individual-level performance management.
The individual performance management  for the aligns individual objective to organizational objectives and encourages them to uphold corporate core value, enable expectations to be defined and agreed in terms of role responsibilities and accountabilities and behaviors, provides opportunities for individuals to identify their own goals and develop their skills and competencies.

Underpinning theories – Buchner (2007)
Goal theory



Goal theory, as developed by Lathanm and Locke (1979), highlights four mechanisms that connect goals to performance outcomes.
01.  They direct attention to priorities
02.  They stimulate effort
03.  The challenge people to bring their knowledge and skills to bear to increase their chances of success
04.  The pore people will draw on their full repertoire of skills.
Advantage- supports the emphasis on performance management on setting and agreeing objectives against which performance can be measured and managed.

Control Theory

Control theory focuses attention on feedback as a means of shaping behaviors. As people relieve feedback on their behavior they appreciate the discrepancy between what they are doing and what they are expected to do and take corrective action to overcome the discrepancy. Feedback is recognized as a crucial part of performance management process.

Social Cognitive theory



This suggests that what people believe they can or cannot do powerfully impacts on their performance. The social cognitive theory was developed by Bandura (1986). It is based on his central concept of self-efficacy. Developing and strengthening positive self-belief in employees is, therefore, an important performance management objective.

Reference/Bibliography
Armstrong, M. (2012) Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice, 12th edition
researchgate.net/figure/Banduras-model-of-Social-Cognitive-Theory-representing-the-triangular-relationship_fig2_257633027

Flexible working



Introduction
Reconsidering traditional employment patterns are calling as flexible working. Better operational flexibility, advance the use of employees’ skills and capacities, increase productivity and employment cost are the aims of the flexible working pattern. This could include operational flexibility, multi-skilling, job sharing, and the use of the sub-controlling and outsourcing, home working and flexible hour arrangements.

·        Operational flexibility
Operational flexibility raises to flexibility in the ways in which work is carried out. Financial flexibility sometimes extends to this term. The three forms of operational flexibility are the following;

Forms of operational flexibility
Description
Functional flexibility
Employees can be redeployed quickly and smoothly between activities and tasks.
Require Workers who process and can apply a number of skills.
Require workers who carry out a number of different tasks in a work team.
Structural flexibility
‘Flexible firm’ where the core of permanent employees are supplemented by a peripheral group of part-time employees, employees on short or fixed-term contracts or sub-contracted workers (Doeringer and Priore (1971) and Atkinson (1984).
Numerical flexibility
Associated with structural flexibility.
The number of employees can be quickly and easily increased or decreased in line with even short-term changes in the level of demand for labor.
Table 1 – Operational Flexibility forms

·         Multi-skilling / Job-Sharing / Homeworking/ Flexible hour arrangements

Introduction
Advantages
Multi-skilling
The employee can be used flexibly, transferring from one task to another as the occasion demands.
This means multi-skilling take place when workers acquire through experience and training a range of different skills they can apply when carrying out different tasks
Job-Sharing
Two employees share the work of one full-time position, dividing pay and benefits between them according to the time each works is an arrangement. This can be splitting days or weeks or, less frequently, working alternate weeks.
Include reduced employee turnover and absenteeism, due to it suits the needs of individuals.
Homeworking
Such roles as consultants, analysts, designers or programmers or undertake administrative works can carry out home-based employees.
Flexibility to respond to fluctuations in demand, reduced overheads and lower employment costs if the homeworkers are self-employed
Flexible hour arrangements
Can include flexible daily hours, weekly hours, daily and weekly hours, compressed working weeks or annual hours.
The employee may follow an agreed pattern day by day according to typical or expected workload, worked at certain peak periods during the year, working time can be unlike daily or weekly the arrangement, work fewer than the five standard days, scheduling hours on the basis on the number of hours to be works.
Table 2 – The reconsidering employments patterns
Flexible working is a pattern of working practice or working hours that deviates from the stranded or normal arrangement has many advantages.

Reference/Bibliography
Armstrong, M. (2012) Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice, 12th edition
Lypton,T (1975) Best fit in the design of organizations,personal review,4(1), pp 15-22